The Principles of Quality
May 31, 2011 Leave a comment
Quality has always been an experience for customers as well as for those of us working on the products. There are definitions of quality that we studied while getting trained in six sigma and TQM methods. But as we practiced quality through working on the production floor, one thing that stood out was that when we did “good” work, it always was an “experience” to the customer and, more importantly, to us. When you produce a quality product, you feel “good”.
I could not define quality, so I delved into some reading and came up with interesting quotes, one defining it from a negative perspective.
Any person of any philosophic persuasion who sits on a hot stove will verify without any intellectual argument whatsoever that he is in an undeniably low-quality situation: that the value of his predicament is negative. This low quality is not just a vague, woolly-headed, crypto-religious, metaphysical abstraction. It is an experience. It is not a judgment about an experience. It is not a description of experience. The value itself is an experience. As such it is completely predictable. It is verifiable by anyone who cares to do so. It is reproducible.
From “Lila” by Robert Pirsig
eMarketer recently reported results of a survey of online marketing tactics by SMBs with the headline:
Star Wars may have passed me by, but I’m a self-professed geek. (In school, I had thick glasses and reading was my favorite past-time, unlike my more cool friends.) 



I’ve 